2 edition of interacting evolution of Soviet and American military doctrines found in the catalog.
interacting evolution of Soviet and American military doctrines
James M. McConnell
by Naval Planning and Management Division, Center for Naval Analyses in Alexandria, Va. (2000 North Beauregard St., Alexandria 22311)
Written in English
Bibliography: p. 101-120.
|Statement||James M. McConnell.|
|Series||Professional paper ;, 412 (Sept. 1980), Professional paper (Center for Naval Analyses) ;, 412.|
|LC Classifications||AS36.C333 A26 no. 412, UA23 A26 no. 412|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||120, 7 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||120|
|LC Control Number||84170259|
Soviet Military Operational Art: In Pursuit of Deep Battle Colonel David M. Glantz David Glantz examines the Soviet study of war, the re-emergence of the operation level and its connection with deep battle, the evolution of the Soviet theory of operations in depth before , and its refinement and application in the European theatre and the. When Gorbachev came to power, the influence of the military had declined somewhat from its highest point in the early s. It was tainted with the blunders of SS deployment, Afghanistan and the shooting down of the Korean airliner (later, the Mathias Rust flight supplied a fourth blunder). Notes in some detail changes of personnel, which have tended to reduce military influence, .
USAF College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education (CADRE) Air and Space Power Mentoring Guide, Vol. 1 Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University Press, (excerpt) Modern military theory divides war into strategic, operational, and tactical levels.1 Although this division has its basis in the Napoleonic Wars and the American Civil War, modern. Based on a study prepared for the RAND project, Soviet Concepts of War in Europe, supported jointly by Project AIR FORCE and the Arroyo Center, the Note should be of interest to individuals and organizations concerned with the evolution of Soviet military doctrine and its potential implications for Soviet force structure and operations.
Isserson, a brigade commander and contemporary of Tukhachevsky, codified this concept into Soviet doctrine by in The Evolution of Operational Art. “Under present conditions,” he wrote, “we must refer not to a series of successive operations, but to a series of successive strategic efforts, and to a series of separate campaigns in a. The Russian Federation creating the doctrine was new; the USSR had recently collapsed, Gorbachev - the creator of the predecessor to this doctrine in - was out of office, and the new Russian military had only been formed in May, The analysis of the doctrine is as follows: a definition of how doctrine is defined; a short history.
A nevve anatomie of vvhole man
Thomas Francis Meagher
Historic parks and gardens of Cheshire
The state-mysteries of the Iesuites, by way of questions and answers
Alone in the dark 3
Maneuver in war.
Brief essays and further rhymes
Children in custody
Footprints of Black Louisiana
Twenty-sixth Mexico-United States Interparliamentary Conference
Specimen of modern printing types by Edmund Fry, Letter Founder to the King, Type Street.
More comfort with less fuel
The evolution of u.s. military doctrine and security policy: from the cold war to current perspectives Article (PDF Available) December with 41 Reads How we measure 'reads'Author: David Russell Pendery.
Report considers the debate over military doctrine and strategy in the final days of the Soviet Union and the first six months of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and Russian Federation. Since the direction that the CIS and former Soviet republics will take should be cast in terms of their immediate past, a brief review of recent Pages: China’s threat perception and relations with the nations of the world has changed with time influencing their military doctrine.
Over the years, the Chinese have evolved four broad military doctrines: The Maoist ‘People’s War Doctrine: It prevailed during the “Lean one side phase” of the Chinese foreign policy. Maturing during the CCP. The Evolution of US Army Tactical Doctrine, By Major Robert A.
Doughty ALTHOUGH the United States contended that counterinsurgency operations should be combated through a combination of military operations and social reform, the demands of tactical operations in the Vietnam War remained the most important concern of the US Army.
This book provides a comprehensive analysis of Paul H. Nitzes influence on the making of U.S. national security policy, as well as his recent involvement in arms control negotiations.
After World War II, Nitze played a major role in drafting a policy paper for the National Security Council Pages: A revolution in military affairs (RMA) is a hypothesis in military theory about the future of warfare, often connected to technological and organizational recommendations for military reform.
Broadly stated, RMA claims that in certain periods of the history of humankind, there were new military doctrines, strategies, tactics and technologies which led to an irrecoverable change in the conduct. Military theorist J.F.C.
Fuller referred to doctrine as “set of principles the Army uses to guide its actions in support of a national objectives.” The Department of Defense, in its quest to make any simple explanation unnecessarily cumbersome, defines doctrine as “fundamental principles by which the military forces or elements thereof.
(). The origins and development of Soviet and Russian military doctrine. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies: Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. In tracing the evolution of Soviet/Russian military doctrine, this study will show how the Soviet leadership created a vast military force to achieve its political aims as a substitute for war.
doctrines, into sections on (1) joint doctrine, (2) naval doctrine, (3) land doctrine, and (4) air doctrine. Joint doctrine refers to the practice of achieving a greater effect on the battlefield by. During the Cold War, many American specialists studied Soviet doctrine for nuclear warfare and the details of the Soviet nuclear force posture.
From this protracted study, a conventional wisdom emerged in the United States. That wisdom loosely characterized the Soviet approach to. Syria a Russian "hybrid armed conflict" The two common features of the Russian Military Doctrines of,and is their defensive nature and the growing attention paid to the so-called Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) phenomena.
Despite widespread belief in the West, the key thesis of Russian Doctrine is to avoid. The Soviet offensive plans controversy is a debate among historians whether Soviet leader Joseph Stalin planned to attack Axis forces in Eastern Europe prior to Operation historians agree that the geopolitical differences between the Soviet Union and the Axis made war inevitable, and that Stalin had made extensive preparations for war and exploited the military conflict in.
The military history of the Soviet Union began in the days following the October Revolution that brought the Bolsheviks to power.
In the new government formed the Red Army, which then defeated its various internal enemies in the Russian Civil War of The years – saw defeats for the Red Army in the Polish-Soviet War () and in independence wars for Estonia.
In this book, Soviet expert Raymond L. Garthoff makes use of unique, newly available material-- including a complete file of the confidential Soviet General Staff journal-- to illuminate the.
Soviet military doctrine lies at the heart of the overall Soviet approach to war, which is quite different from that of the West.
War, as the Soviets see it, is a science, something gov-erned by certain “laws” and principles reflected in military history, and past and present wars, tests, maneuvers, and the like. Soviet military “doctrine. Russia’s last military doctrine was released on Christmas Day in Since then, Moscow has been busy — it intervened in Syria, meddled in U.S.
elections, and showcased a half-dozen developmental weapons, to include a nuclear-powered cruise missile and a transoceanic addition, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty collapsed, and the New Strategic Arms.
Abstract. This Paper offers an interpretation of the evolution of Soviet military doctrine. It begins by reviewing certain enduring features of Soviet military doctrine which must be kept in mind if one is to understand not only contemporary developments but also their origihs.
The formative years of Soviet operational art the Civil War and Leninist base of military doctrine ()-- the evolution of a socialist military doctrine ()-- the technical reconstruction of the armed forces and the theory of deep operations ()-- crisis in the Soviet military establishment ().
The ideological basis for Soviet military needs cannot be discounted lightly. Below the level of theory about class struggle, a body of Marxist-Leninist thought about military science and doctrine has been articulated and imbued in both the officer corps and the party leadership, providing them with a rather sophisticated system of categories for dealing with such practical military problems.
Foreign policy can be defined as the strategy a government uses to deal with other nations. James Monroe pronounced the first major presidential foreign policy doctrine for the newly created United States on December 2, InTheodore Roosevelt made a significant amendment to the Monroe Doctrine.
While many other presidents announced overarching foreign .Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), Rus.
Soyuz Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik, former republic. It was established in and dissolved in The Soviet Union was the first state to be based on Marxist socialism (see also Marxism; communism).Until the Communist party indirectly controlled all levels of government; the party's politburo effectively ruled the country.If you enjoy military history, you should definitely get this book.
The Soviet Union was one of the pre-eminent military powers of the 20th century, and this compendium of essays by military scholars explains how a rag-tag would-be world power that collapsed in disarray during World War I, first fought a complex civil war for five years, then built a military force capable of defeating the Reviews: 6.